Disclosure: Global Sports sells both blades. We have not personally play-tested the SANWEI 75R or 75G. This guide separates specifications from our current product listings, other reviewers' playing impressions, and our own interpretation. It is not an independent hands-on review.
The SANWEI 75R and 75G share the 75-series name, but their constructions differ. The 75R pairs a Koto surface with outer H-GLC fiber; the 75G pairs Limba with inner G-ALC fiber. Here is a practical way to compare them without treating either as an automatic upgrade over the other.
Specifications at a glance
The table follows Global Sports' current product descriptions. Dimensions and weight ranges are listed specifications, not measurements we made for this article. Individual blades can vary.
| Specification | SANWEI 75R | SANWEI 75G |
|---|---|---|
| Construction | 5 wood + 2 fiber layers, outer placement | 5 wood + 2 fiber layers, inner placement |
| Fiber designation | H-GLC; listed as Taiwan Taisu fiber | G-ALC; listed as Japanese Kuraray green polyarylate fiber |
| Surface wood | Koto | Limba |
| Middle wood | Ayous | Ayous |
| Core wood | Paulownia | Ayous |
| Thickness | 5.7 ± 0.1 mm | 6.0 ± 0.1 mm |
| Listed weight | 88–90 g | 88–93 g |
| Blade face dimensions | 158 × 150 mm | Not stated in the current text description |
| Listed handle options | FL, CS, ST | FL, CS, ST |
Check the selected variant on each product page before ordering. The 75G description highlights FL, while the current variant selector also lists CS and ST.
Our sample photos and scale readings
These are our own photos of the two samples. The scale shows 89.2 g for the 75R and 91.9 g for the 75G, with protective wrapping and labels still attached. These are individual sample readings, not bare-blade measurements or guaranteed weights for every blade.
Blade edge details
The close-ups show the edges of the two samples. They are visual references; layer thickness and material composition cannot be measured or verified from these photos alone.
Packaging specifications
The box side panels provide an additional reference for the manufacturer-printed specifications. Printed specifications are distinct from the sample scale readings above. Tap or click any photo to view it at full size.
SANWEI 75R: what reviewers report
Mogu Table Tennis describes the 75R as crisp and responsive, with quick ball release and an emphasis on direct attacking play. The reviewer also reports a trade-off in dwell and spin and sees close-to-mid-distance play as its stronger use case. These are the author's impressions, not measured performance guarantees. Read the review in UltraSpin's English translation.
Lao P's comparison describes the 75R as more controlled and a little less immediate than the older Blue 75. This uses a different reference blade from Mogu's broader comparison, so the reports do not establish a universal speed ranking. Read the translated comparison.
SANWEI 75G: what reviewers report
In the same comparison, Lao P describes the production 75G as having a wood-like response at medium effort, with additional support when the stroke becomes stronger. The author found it more linear and manageable than an earlier prototype, with less of that prototype's pronounced kick. The distinction matters: comments about the prototype should not be treated as promises about the retail blade. Source: Lao P's comparison, translated by UltraSpin.
The cited text does not provide a complete rubber setup for these comparisons. Rubber choice, blade weight and the player's stroke can affect the result, so use the reports as questions to explore rather than a substitute for trying a blade.
How to choose between them
Our interpretation of the reports: the 75R is worth shortlisting if you prefer a direct response and compact attacking strokes. The 75G is worth considering if you are looking for the wood-like feel and more gradual power response described by Lao P. This is a starting point for selection, not a claim that either blade will suit every player in that group.
Before deciding, write down what you want to change about your current racket: the short game, first attack, blocking, or sustained rallies. Compare that need with the reports above, then consider your handle preference and desired total racket weight. If possible, try both with the same rubbers to make the comparison more useful.
We have not established that one blade is faster, spinnier or easier for beginners in a controlled test. There is no single winner for every playing style.
View the two blades
See each product page for current pricing, available variants and product photos.
Sources and limitations
- Specifications: the two Global Sports product listings linked above, checked on September 24, 2026.
- Mogu Table Tennis / Mogu Liao Pingpang, 75R review, originally dated July 10, 2026; English translation hosted by UltraSpin.
- Lao P Pingpang Shiwusuo, 75R and 75G comparison, originally dated May 27, 2026; English translation hosted by UltraSpin.
The English review pages state that they were translated and republished with permission. Their linked Chinese originals were not accessible during this check, so our summaries rely on the available translations. We have paraphrased the impressions and have not reproduced the reviewers' photos.
Fiber naming: Lao P's translated article calls the 75R an arylate-carbon blade, which differs from our store's H-GLC designation. We retain H-GLC for the 75R and G-ALC for the 75G throughout this guide; the review is used for attributed impressions, not to overwrite the store's material specifications.